top of page

My opponent and I agree on many issues, ranging from the environment to creating community places. However, we disagree on Kenmore’s most controversial issue. My opponent strongly supported the Plymouth Housing project, insisting we should approve the six-story, low-barrier "homeless upon entry" housing project.​ 

 

By contrast, I listened to the many Kenmore parents, small businesses, and community members who voiced serious concerns. You can care deeply for our unhoused neighbors while still respecting community concerns. This was never about opposing affordable housing or STEP housing. I have a strong record supporting affordable policies, but I believe we must honor community input, avoid external pressure, ensure public benefits for Kenmore, and work together!

Get to Know Joe!

Brief
Resume

  • Inglemoor Graduate

  • Kenmore Council Member

  • Public Defender

  • Previous Northshore Rotary President

  • Previous Cascadia Community College Foundation Board Member

  • Previous Northshore Parks and Recreation Service Area Board Member

Proud Accomplishments

  • Imagine Housing - 100 New Affordable Family Units

  • Secured Greater Protections for Mobile Home Residents

  • Balanced Middle Housing Plan

  • New Senior Women's Shelter

  • Expanded Access to Lake Washington

  • Kenmore's First Climate Action Plan

Key
Priorities

  • Protecting the Environment

  • Affordable Housing

  • Community Gathering Places

  • Financial Sustainability

  • Local Voices, Local Choices

Highlighted
Endorsements

(Titles for Identification Only)​

  • Girmay Zahilay - King County Councilmember

  • Rod Dembowski - King County Councilmember

  • Melanie O'Cain - Kenmore Deputy Mayor

  • Nathan Loutsis - Kenmore Councilmember

  • Javier Valdez - State Senator (D)

  • Caitlin Sullivan - STEP Housing Advisor and my former Primary Opponent 🤝

  • Josh Kurchinka - STEP Housing Advisor

  • Peter Lance - People for Environmentally Responsible Kenmore Board Member

  • A Record Amount of Small Businesses

Resized_20250524_110030_edited_edited.jp
1.jpeg
DZ6_4518.jpg
IMG_1288.png
Resized 3 2_edited.jpg
IMG_0565.HEIC

Moving Forward

As a Public Defender, I advocate for our region’s most vulnerable every day in the justice system! I know that successful housing requires the right support systems. At the time, Kenmore lacked the financial resources, services, and infrastructure needed for this size of low-barrier housing to succeed.

  • 01
  • 02
  • 03
  • 04
  • 05
  • 06
  • 07

My Plan

What Happened with Kenmore's Plymouth Project?

Many Kenmore residents first understood the project as low-income housing for seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and formerly homeless individuals.​ The day after the 2023 city council election, the demographic change caused by state funding became apparent. On November 27th, 2023, the public became aware of the scope change based on Plymouth’s public presentation. On December 8th, 2023, the City's "Top 4" email newsletter clearly states, "a recent change in the funding requirement occurred when the Department of Commerce and Washington State Housing Finance Commission required that all incoming residents be homeless at entry as a condition of funding."

On December 11, 2023, after a meeting that lasted until 3 a.m., I joined the council majority in voting against. When the project was revisited on January 18, 2024, I again joined the council majority in voting against. Both nights, City Hall was overflowing: standing room only in the chamber and even into the lobby. ​

I listened closely to all of you and carried your voices into my decision.

Community Concerns

Safety & Services

This low-barrier project required no mandatory sobriety or treatment for residentsIn 2024, Plymouth reported 78% of residents had a substance use disorder, and 77% had a mental health condition. There was no Good Neighbor Agreement in place at the time. The public felt that such a large-scale building was not appropriate next to the library, in the heart of our little downtown, and within 100 yards of the children’s "splash pad".

Population Details

The original Request for Proposal (RFP) was titled “Kenmore Senior Housing”. During the planning process and outreach, this proposed project was described as 0% - 30% AMI housing for “low-income seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and formerly homeless individuals”. Our community welcomed this type of project and was so eager to help our low-income neighbors! When the population requirement of "Homeless Upon Entry" became more detailed on November 27th, 2023, and publicly emailed on December 8th, 2023, the community came out and voiced their concerns.

Zoning Violations

The project relied on major exceptions to our zoning code. In 2023, the current code allowed for a maximum of 75 units for a site of this size, and this project was proposed for 100 units. Meaning a 33% increase from the original city code requirements. Deviations from the code require community benefit. There was insufficient benefit to Kenmore, so the Council voted no. 

Parent Concerns

Business Concerns

Kenmore’s small business community rarely weighs in on politics - until this project.

Signed Petition

55 local small business leaders signed a petition urging the City Council not to move forward with this project. They believed this particular project was not the right fit for the downtown core at the time.

Businesses Still Recovering 

With many of these businesses still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, it was more essential than ever to get their input. Many businesses worried about the lack of adequate wraparound onsite services, and safety could become a challenge for both residents and the nearby surrounding areas.

Two years later, I am proud to have a record number of business endorsements.

They trust me because I have demonstrated that I bring their ideas to the table!

Why I Voted to Seek Better Solutions

I respect those who spoke and emailed in favor, and I carefully weighed their perspectives, even if they came from as far away as Kent. Different viewpoints matter and play a crucial role in our democracies! But the majority of concerns from Kenmore residents were too serious to ignore.

My Concern for Plymouth Residents

As a Public Defender, I spend every day supporting and advocating for our region’s most vulnerable, including many unhoused clients in the justice system! I understand the importance of types of affordable housing, support services, and guidelines that allow all people to thrive.

My Further Concerns for Transparency

Capacity Increase

At the January 18th meeting, it came out that the project could potentially house up to 2 people per studio and 3 people per one-bedroom. Plymouth indicated this would rarely occur; however, this could have been a sharp increase from the 100-person occupancy.

Questions Ignored

One Councilmember emailed a list of questions to get valuable insights for the community, but Plymouth didn’t respond.

After Kenmore Spoke

A week after the project denial, legislation HB 2474 was introduced in Olympia. The bill was dubbed “The Kenmore Bill”. It was a knee-jerk reaction to Kenmore’s decision and was designed to make an example out of our community speaking out.

How the Bill Would Have Affected You

Reduce Local Democracies

The bill would have allowed the state (via Dept. of Commerce) to review and potentially override city decisions. State bureaucrats, not your elected city officials, would be making decisions about local zoning and neighborhood projects. I believe that if you don’t agree with a policy decision I make, you deserve the chance to know where I stand and vote me out.

Limited Accountability

With Commerce having the final review power (over projects they already approved), you would have had less opportunity to participate meaningfully in hearings or appeals, making it harder to influence decisions or understand how local resources would be impacted. If you want to support a project or voice your ideas, I believe you should be able to drive down to City Hall and not Olympia.

The Path Forward and My Commitment to You

The state requires us to plan for Permanent Supportive Housing, but you deserve a say in the process. When solving these large issues, we need to work together. When the community is involved, we bring valuable insights and diverse perspectives.

With the federal government chipping power away from local jurisdictions, you can be assured that I will continue to fight for free speech and for your local control. When our state also tries to restrict your right to have a say on projects in Kenmore, I will continue advocating for you.

I encourage you to dig into this topic on your own. It’s an important issue that will impact Kenmore’s future and every city in Washington.

Even when it meant losing my party’s endorsements and facing political pressure from peers, I stood with our community when it mattered most. I grew up in Kenmore, and I care about you and your voice. I’m not running for a pat on the back from groups that have never visited Kenmore. I’m here to serve and listen to you -- full stop.

I will continue to fight for responsible growth, community input, and affordable housing and STEP Housing solutions that work for Kenmore. We can and must support our unhoused neighbors, but we must do it together, do it smart, and with heart!

Your Neighbor,

Screenshot 2025-10-14 at 2.00.34 PM.png
bottom of page